Kerr (2007) asks us if the
isms of learning theory are useful for what we think and do.
During the first few years of
my learning in the master program for teaching I learned about the different
learning theories. The application of these theories did not come into focus
for me until I was a seasoned teacher with a few years of experience behind me.
To me at the time they each seemed to work separately based on the ideology
that they had.
As a seasoned teacher I see
now that the ideas of constructing knowledge and learning knowledge through
behavior are not really separate at all. Each student takes meaning in
different ways and some may go through various stages of each learning theory
to create lasting meaning with the content.
Memorizing science terms and
being able to apply the terms to real life application is something that is
accomplished through the use of both cognitive and behaviorist theory. The
students are expected to behave in a certain way and memorize the terms but the
deeper learning comes when the use the cognitive theory and relate the terms to
their daily life.
Kerr, B. (2007, January 1).
_isms as filter, not blinker [Web log post]. Retrieved fromhttp://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html
Kapp, K. (2007, January 2). Out and about: Discussion on
educational schools of thought [Web log post]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/
Responses to